![]() The nullification of the 1996 DOAS and all subsequent transactions involving the disputed lot for being void ab initio 18ģ. The declaration of Petitioners as true and rightful owners of the disputed lot 17Ģ. (For Attorney's Fees and Litigation Expenses) 16īased on these causes of action, Petitioners prayed for the following reliefs:ġ. (For: Accounting and Remittance, if any, of ll Income and Profits vis-a-vis the ) 13 T-97059 and T-138212 and Any and All Transfers and Dealings Thereafter) 11 (Re: Declaration of Nullity Based on Double Sale (sic) of and TCT Nos. (For: Declaration of Plaintiffs' Ownership and Nullity of the and ) 10 In their Complaint, Petitioners stated their causes of action, as follows: On December 10, 2014, Petitioners filed a complaint before the RTC (Complaint) against Spouses Garcia, DAA Realty and MLI, as well as Philippine National Bank (PNB) to whom the disputed lot had been mortgaged. With this discovery, Petitioners immediately caused, on September 1, 2010, the annotation of their Affidavit of Adverse Claim on MLI's Torrens titles. Spouses Garcia as sellers and DAA Realty Corporation (DAA Realty) as buyer T-77703 had been stamped "cancelled", and replaced by subsequent Torrens titles issued on the basis of the following transactions: 7 Date Upon further investigation, Petitioners learned that TCT No. (MLI) with other adjoining lots in Misibis, and sub-divided into smaller lots covered by several new Torrens titles. In 2010, when Petitioners resumed processing the transfer of the Torrens title to their names, they discovered that the disputed lot had been consolidated by Misibis Land, Inc. T-77703, but they were not able to cause the transfer of the Torrens title in their name since they lacked the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) clearance necessary to do so. They were successful in having the 1991 DOAS duly annotated on TCT No. T-77703, attempted to register the corresponding Deed of Absolute Sale dated Decem(1991 DOAS) with the Register of Deeds of Albay (RD). On April 6, 1992, Petitioners, armed with the original owner's duplicate copy of TCT No. ![]() Petitioners paid the taxes arising from the transaction. On December 9, 1991, Petitioners purchased from Oscar and Cidra Garcia (Spouses Garcia) a parcel of land (disputed lot) in Misibis, Cagraray Island, Albay with an area of 6.4868 hectares, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. Order 3 dated Decem(Second RTC Order) denying Petitioners' motion for reconsideration. Valdellon (Petitioners) on the ground of prescription and lack of jurisdiction andĢ. Order 2 dated Octo(First RTC Order) dismissing the complaint filed by petitioners Mercedes S. This is a petition for review on certiorari 1 (Petition) filed under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court against the following orders issued by the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Tabaco City, Branch 15 in Civil Case No. This Memorandum Circular shall take effect immediately.MERCEDES S. With this, applications for extension of validity flowing during last quarter of every year shall be limited, and for the Board to improve its target annual income.Īll issuances inconsistent herewith are hereby superseded and amended accordingly. ![]() Further, all decisions approving pending and future application/s with extension of validity expiring on December 31 shall now have an expiring date set on October 31. In relation thereto, all CPCs with expiration date set on months of Novembers and Decembers are ordered to file their application for extension of validity prior to October 31. Thus, in order to preserve the said validity period, approval of Applications/Petitions for Extension of Validity with unit/s reaching the maximum age requirement allowed by this Board shall still have five (5) year validity and subsistence, but the unit/s reaching the maximum age requirement as provided under existing issuances of the Department of Transportation and Communications and this Board shall not be confirmed on that year. ![]() Records of this Board revealed that substantial number of Certificates of Public Convenience has their supposed five (5) year validity date shortened by reason attributable to the maximum age requirement of unit/s.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |